AutoXpert
Administrator
2006 ZX-14 vs. Hayabusa
7/15/2006
By Ken Hutchison
In this era of miniscule MP3 players, miniature data devices and dainty hybrid automobiles, it may not come as a surprise that some people truly believe bigger isn't always better. Well, there are exceptions, and in the case of the venerable Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa and the brand new Kawasaki ZX-14 Ninja, they would be wrong, dead wrong.
Everything about these two land-based projectiles is big. The bikes are big, the motors are big, and with the ability to surpass 100 mph in less than 5 seconds, the consequences of riding one while trying to push them to their limits can also be big.
For the last decade the Hayabusa has had a stranglehold on the ultimate-sportbike category, as Suzuki likes to call it, and has laid waste to all-comers. In the process, the Busa spawned a new genre where extended swingarms, chromed chassis and wicked paint jobs - supplemented by turbochargers and nitrous bottles - are a prerequisite for even being accepted into the group. Sure, there have been a few contenders over the years, but the Busa has beaten them all back with its combination of a bad-ass motor, a solid chassis and one of the most unique profiles ever seen on a modern motorcycle. It poses the question: Is there a contender out there that can dethrone the Hayabusa?
Yeah, it's brand new, it's called the Kawasaki ZX-14 and it absolutely rocks. But once you're the King of the Hill, like the Busa has been, you have to be knocked off, and that's where this test comes in. We put these two heavyweights through the gauntlet at three different venues in order to uncover the winner: A horsepower shootout on the dyno, a 36-hour 800-mile ride on the street, and to cap it all off a decisive head-to-head battle at the local dragstrip, to settle once and for all which bike is the baddest mo-fo in the valley.
The design of the Hayabusa has remained relatively unchanged since its introduction in late 1998 for the '99 model year. The bike was met with mixed reviews from the public, due initially to the sheer size of the bike as well as its bulbous aerodynamic bodywork and pointy nose. Once the news of its performance envelope was revealed, it rapidly matured to legendary status on the street. Nothing else could hope to hang with it at the strip, as it was the first production bike capable of running a 9-second quarter-mile. The Hayabusa has been a staple for dealers, as sales have steadily increased year after year, beating the sales number of the previous season since '99. Suzuki says more than 10,000 units were sold in 2005 alone.
In comparison, the ZX-14 was only introduced earlier this year. An entire faction of Kawasaki fans have been anxiously awaiting the arrival of the biggest Ninja ever created, and we're here to decide if it was worth the wait. When the bike was unveiled at the famed Las Vegas Motor Speedway, we learned that Kawasaki intended to dethrone the Hayabusa with this bike. We discovered at the introduction that anyone with a bit of skill at the strip can post 10-second runs on the ZX, and our fast guy even ran an uncorrected 9.78 at 147 mph. The new ZX was purposely designed with the art of drag racing in mind, and the 186-mph-capable machine is stuffed to the rev limiter with the latest trick hardware from Tokyo. In the high-stakes world of drag racing it is the numbers that count, and Kawasaki knows it.
Holy Kaw
The first setting we pitted the new ZX against the Hayabusa was Hansen's Motorcycle's Dynojet 250 dyno. On paper, these two machines look close, so the only way to get the answers everyone is looking for is to run 'em on the dyno. The Hayabusa motor, which has been the bane of Kawasaki's existence for a few years now, is a 1299cc DOHC, 16-valve fuel-injected beast featuring an 11.0:1 compression ratio with an 81mm bore and 63mm stroke. The ZX-14 mill is a similar but bigger 1352cc DOHC, 16-valve fuel-injected fiend with a slightly larger bore and shorter stroke numbers, 84.0 x 61.0mm, and a 12.0:1 compression ratio.
First up: the Hayabusa. The Suzuki posted an imposing 155.9 horsepower at 9,900 rpm on its best run. The power curve gets the jump on the ZX-14 until just before 5,000 rpm and then arcs across the 150-hp mark around 8,600 rpm. Its torque output was equally impressive thanks to a whopping 94 lb-ft at 7,000 rpm. Again, the Busa takes the early lead with a 7-8 lb-ft advantage from 2,500 to 4,000 rpm. It's easy to see why this bike has been so popular with the speed-crazed freaks all over this miserable little politically-correct planet.
Next it was time to find out what the ZX-14 could do. Pre-run predictions ranged from 170 to 180 horsepower, but that would end up an optimistic postulation. The ZX could only muster a best run of 169.1 hp at 9,500 rpm. Pathetic, isn't it? Did you catch the sarcasm there? Nearly 170 horsepower from a stock bike - what is the world coming to? Seems pretty extraordinary but, wait, there's more. As impressive as the Busa torque figures are, the ZX holds a clear torque advantage over the reigning champ from 4,500 on to redline, pumping out its peak of 103 lb-ft at 7,800 rpm.
What you will notice is the big dip in the results at the very beginning of the ZX curve. Kawasaki claims to have engineered this so that the bike would be more user-friendly on the street. By contrast, the Hayabusa has no such safety measure, so you get a noticeably more-abrupt feeling from the throttle on it than the Kawasaki. Whereas the Suzuki feels like it wants to pull a wheelie as soon as you crack it open, the ZX-14 remains a bit more tranquil. It doesn't look so good on paper, but the Ninja's massive torque figures will quickly erase any notion that this is a shortcoming as soon as you dial-up some throttle.
With this disparity in both the horsepower and torque figures acknowledged, the Kawasaki is the unanimous winner in round one. On the dyno, the Ninja reigns supreme, but there are still two more arenas in which this battle is to be waged. Next up: The street ride.
Cannonball Run
Do you remember the theme song from Smokey and the Bandit? 'We've got a long way to go and a short time to get there.' Well, that's what kept playing in my head as we made our express run for the border of Northern California. It was Thursday morning and we were just leaving HQ in Medford, OR, and the plan was to drag race the bikes the next evening at the local Friday Night Drags at Champion Raceway. Our route would cover nearly 800 miles, starting with a 180-mile excursion down I-5 to NorCal's Red Bluff where we hooked-up with the curvy Highway 36. This was the start of the 180-mile run to the Pacific Coast and our destination at the end of day one, Arcata, CA. The next day we would complete the loop by riding up the Highway 101 past Crescent City before hooking up with Highway 199 that would take us almost the rest of the way home, through the Redwood Forest, up the Smith River canyon, past Illinois Valley and back to Medford, hopefully with time to spare. If you want to get from point-A to point-B in record time, might as well do it on than the fastest bikes ever built.
Droning down the freeway never is that much fun, but here in Oregon we're blessed with the Siskiyou mountain range that ensures the interstate is in fact a twisted one. Each bike offered up decent wind protection for a sportbike but the riding positions are markedly different. Both bikes are much more comfortable than any pure sportbike over the long haul, but your body size and personal preference will play a big part in which one will suit you best.
The Hayabusa has a much more sport-oriented riding position, so the lower, narrower bars put a bit of extra pressure on the rider's upper body and wrists while the pegs force your legs into a more acute angle. This pays dividends when the road turns into a roller coaster, but you pay for it during the long and boring stretches of the ride. The twin-spar aluminum frame and big fuel tank on the Busa causes it to feel wide between the knees and subsequently makes it feel even bigger than it really is.
The ZX bars are higher and the pegs feel lower, so the rider's body and legs are not in such a cramped position, but the heat emanating from the opening in the ZX bodywork is directed onto your thighs. That fissure of warmth was useful when it got cold, but it wasn't so great in the heat and was really noticeable around town. The monocoque frame wraps over the motor rather than around it, which keeps the girth to a minimum relative to the Suzuki. The tank feels narrower too, so when you climb on the ZX after riding the Hayabusa it feels like a smaller bike. Wind protection from the Ninja's windscreen and the bodywork is quite a bit better thanks to its enormous front cowling.
Both seats are equally wide and supportive, so it took a while to figure out any shortcomings. After swapping bikes a couple times and spending close to an hour in the saddle, the ZX feels like it is pushing the rider forward into the tank. Its seat is comfortable, but it packs down near the tank after about an hour in the saddle - sitting further rearward helps. The Busa seat is plush, but after awhile it irritates a rider as it starts to mold to the shape of your butt cheeks. In both cases, a rider benefits from repositioning on the seats for maximum endurance.
The counter-balanced engines are super-smooth with very little in the way of vibration making its way through the bars. In fact the ZX feels downright silky and only gets vibey once the tach swings past 4500 rpm. In contrast, the Busa motor sent more vibes into the bars, but it too was very smooth and only started to get annoying after 4500 rpm. In either case, those revs equal about 90 mph, so it can be argued that this is barely worth a mention. The instruments of both machines include temperature, fuel, dual tripmeters, and clock, but the ZX's LCD information screen nestled nicely between the speedo and tach (including a gear-position indicator) looks new and high tech compared to the Suzuki's bland dials and faux-carbon-fiber frame. The mirrors on the Busa are partially obstructed by the rider's elbows whereas the ZX stalks are longer and place the mirrors farther out, which offer up an unobstructed view but makes for a long reach to adjust them once you're underway. On these bikes, it's important to keep your eyes peeled and your butt covered since the fuzz often approaches from the backside of its prey.
Suspension on either bike is very good, and stability from the long wheelbases, 58.5 inches for the Busa and 57.5 for the Ninja, make for pleasant highway rides. They both feature a fully-adjustable 43mm inverted fork complimented by a single shock at the rear. No matter which way you go, you can rest assured both of these bikes roll down the road like a freight train running on velvet rails. They made believers out of us during the long freeway ride to our first stop at Railroad Park Resort. This little gem features cabins that are actually retired cabooses from the not-too-distant past, tucked away secretly against the backdrop of Castle Crags State Park in northern California.
7/15/2006
By Ken Hutchison
In this era of miniscule MP3 players, miniature data devices and dainty hybrid automobiles, it may not come as a surprise that some people truly believe bigger isn't always better. Well, there are exceptions, and in the case of the venerable Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa and the brand new Kawasaki ZX-14 Ninja, they would be wrong, dead wrong.
Everything about these two land-based projectiles is big. The bikes are big, the motors are big, and with the ability to surpass 100 mph in less than 5 seconds, the consequences of riding one while trying to push them to their limits can also be big.
For the last decade the Hayabusa has had a stranglehold on the ultimate-sportbike category, as Suzuki likes to call it, and has laid waste to all-comers. In the process, the Busa spawned a new genre where extended swingarms, chromed chassis and wicked paint jobs - supplemented by turbochargers and nitrous bottles - are a prerequisite for even being accepted into the group. Sure, there have been a few contenders over the years, but the Busa has beaten them all back with its combination of a bad-ass motor, a solid chassis and one of the most unique profiles ever seen on a modern motorcycle. It poses the question: Is there a contender out there that can dethrone the Hayabusa?
Yeah, it's brand new, it's called the Kawasaki ZX-14 and it absolutely rocks. But once you're the King of the Hill, like the Busa has been, you have to be knocked off, and that's where this test comes in. We put these two heavyweights through the gauntlet at three different venues in order to uncover the winner: A horsepower shootout on the dyno, a 36-hour 800-mile ride on the street, and to cap it all off a decisive head-to-head battle at the local dragstrip, to settle once and for all which bike is the baddest mo-fo in the valley.
The design of the Hayabusa has remained relatively unchanged since its introduction in late 1998 for the '99 model year. The bike was met with mixed reviews from the public, due initially to the sheer size of the bike as well as its bulbous aerodynamic bodywork and pointy nose. Once the news of its performance envelope was revealed, it rapidly matured to legendary status on the street. Nothing else could hope to hang with it at the strip, as it was the first production bike capable of running a 9-second quarter-mile. The Hayabusa has been a staple for dealers, as sales have steadily increased year after year, beating the sales number of the previous season since '99. Suzuki says more than 10,000 units were sold in 2005 alone.
In comparison, the ZX-14 was only introduced earlier this year. An entire faction of Kawasaki fans have been anxiously awaiting the arrival of the biggest Ninja ever created, and we're here to decide if it was worth the wait. When the bike was unveiled at the famed Las Vegas Motor Speedway, we learned that Kawasaki intended to dethrone the Hayabusa with this bike. We discovered at the introduction that anyone with a bit of skill at the strip can post 10-second runs on the ZX, and our fast guy even ran an uncorrected 9.78 at 147 mph. The new ZX was purposely designed with the art of drag racing in mind, and the 186-mph-capable machine is stuffed to the rev limiter with the latest trick hardware from Tokyo. In the high-stakes world of drag racing it is the numbers that count, and Kawasaki knows it.
Holy Kaw
The first setting we pitted the new ZX against the Hayabusa was Hansen's Motorcycle's Dynojet 250 dyno. On paper, these two machines look close, so the only way to get the answers everyone is looking for is to run 'em on the dyno. The Hayabusa motor, which has been the bane of Kawasaki's existence for a few years now, is a 1299cc DOHC, 16-valve fuel-injected beast featuring an 11.0:1 compression ratio with an 81mm bore and 63mm stroke. The ZX-14 mill is a similar but bigger 1352cc DOHC, 16-valve fuel-injected fiend with a slightly larger bore and shorter stroke numbers, 84.0 x 61.0mm, and a 12.0:1 compression ratio.
First up: the Hayabusa. The Suzuki posted an imposing 155.9 horsepower at 9,900 rpm on its best run. The power curve gets the jump on the ZX-14 until just before 5,000 rpm and then arcs across the 150-hp mark around 8,600 rpm. Its torque output was equally impressive thanks to a whopping 94 lb-ft at 7,000 rpm. Again, the Busa takes the early lead with a 7-8 lb-ft advantage from 2,500 to 4,000 rpm. It's easy to see why this bike has been so popular with the speed-crazed freaks all over this miserable little politically-correct planet.
Next it was time to find out what the ZX-14 could do. Pre-run predictions ranged from 170 to 180 horsepower, but that would end up an optimistic postulation. The ZX could only muster a best run of 169.1 hp at 9,500 rpm. Pathetic, isn't it? Did you catch the sarcasm there? Nearly 170 horsepower from a stock bike - what is the world coming to? Seems pretty extraordinary but, wait, there's more. As impressive as the Busa torque figures are, the ZX holds a clear torque advantage over the reigning champ from 4,500 on to redline, pumping out its peak of 103 lb-ft at 7,800 rpm.
What you will notice is the big dip in the results at the very beginning of the ZX curve. Kawasaki claims to have engineered this so that the bike would be more user-friendly on the street. By contrast, the Hayabusa has no such safety measure, so you get a noticeably more-abrupt feeling from the throttle on it than the Kawasaki. Whereas the Suzuki feels like it wants to pull a wheelie as soon as you crack it open, the ZX-14 remains a bit more tranquil. It doesn't look so good on paper, but the Ninja's massive torque figures will quickly erase any notion that this is a shortcoming as soon as you dial-up some throttle.
With this disparity in both the horsepower and torque figures acknowledged, the Kawasaki is the unanimous winner in round one. On the dyno, the Ninja reigns supreme, but there are still two more arenas in which this battle is to be waged. Next up: The street ride.
Cannonball Run
Do you remember the theme song from Smokey and the Bandit? 'We've got a long way to go and a short time to get there.' Well, that's what kept playing in my head as we made our express run for the border of Northern California. It was Thursday morning and we were just leaving HQ in Medford, OR, and the plan was to drag race the bikes the next evening at the local Friday Night Drags at Champion Raceway. Our route would cover nearly 800 miles, starting with a 180-mile excursion down I-5 to NorCal's Red Bluff where we hooked-up with the curvy Highway 36. This was the start of the 180-mile run to the Pacific Coast and our destination at the end of day one, Arcata, CA. The next day we would complete the loop by riding up the Highway 101 past Crescent City before hooking up with Highway 199 that would take us almost the rest of the way home, through the Redwood Forest, up the Smith River canyon, past Illinois Valley and back to Medford, hopefully with time to spare. If you want to get from point-A to point-B in record time, might as well do it on than the fastest bikes ever built.
Droning down the freeway never is that much fun, but here in Oregon we're blessed with the Siskiyou mountain range that ensures the interstate is in fact a twisted one. Each bike offered up decent wind protection for a sportbike but the riding positions are markedly different. Both bikes are much more comfortable than any pure sportbike over the long haul, but your body size and personal preference will play a big part in which one will suit you best.
The Hayabusa has a much more sport-oriented riding position, so the lower, narrower bars put a bit of extra pressure on the rider's upper body and wrists while the pegs force your legs into a more acute angle. This pays dividends when the road turns into a roller coaster, but you pay for it during the long and boring stretches of the ride. The twin-spar aluminum frame and big fuel tank on the Busa causes it to feel wide between the knees and subsequently makes it feel even bigger than it really is.
The ZX bars are higher and the pegs feel lower, so the rider's body and legs are not in such a cramped position, but the heat emanating from the opening in the ZX bodywork is directed onto your thighs. That fissure of warmth was useful when it got cold, but it wasn't so great in the heat and was really noticeable around town. The monocoque frame wraps over the motor rather than around it, which keeps the girth to a minimum relative to the Suzuki. The tank feels narrower too, so when you climb on the ZX after riding the Hayabusa it feels like a smaller bike. Wind protection from the Ninja's windscreen and the bodywork is quite a bit better thanks to its enormous front cowling.
Both seats are equally wide and supportive, so it took a while to figure out any shortcomings. After swapping bikes a couple times and spending close to an hour in the saddle, the ZX feels like it is pushing the rider forward into the tank. Its seat is comfortable, but it packs down near the tank after about an hour in the saddle - sitting further rearward helps. The Busa seat is plush, but after awhile it irritates a rider as it starts to mold to the shape of your butt cheeks. In both cases, a rider benefits from repositioning on the seats for maximum endurance.
The counter-balanced engines are super-smooth with very little in the way of vibration making its way through the bars. In fact the ZX feels downright silky and only gets vibey once the tach swings past 4500 rpm. In contrast, the Busa motor sent more vibes into the bars, but it too was very smooth and only started to get annoying after 4500 rpm. In either case, those revs equal about 90 mph, so it can be argued that this is barely worth a mention. The instruments of both machines include temperature, fuel, dual tripmeters, and clock, but the ZX's LCD information screen nestled nicely between the speedo and tach (including a gear-position indicator) looks new and high tech compared to the Suzuki's bland dials and faux-carbon-fiber frame. The mirrors on the Busa are partially obstructed by the rider's elbows whereas the ZX stalks are longer and place the mirrors farther out, which offer up an unobstructed view but makes for a long reach to adjust them once you're underway. On these bikes, it's important to keep your eyes peeled and your butt covered since the fuzz often approaches from the backside of its prey.
Suspension on either bike is very good, and stability from the long wheelbases, 58.5 inches for the Busa and 57.5 for the Ninja, make for pleasant highway rides. They both feature a fully-adjustable 43mm inverted fork complimented by a single shock at the rear. No matter which way you go, you can rest assured both of these bikes roll down the road like a freight train running on velvet rails. They made believers out of us during the long freeway ride to our first stop at Railroad Park Resort. This little gem features cabins that are actually retired cabooses from the not-too-distant past, tucked away secretly against the backdrop of Castle Crags State Park in northern California.
Last edited: